The Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County is pleased to announce legal professional Jena Acos to its board of directors. Ms. Acos is an associate with Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, where she practices water regulation and public company law. She is a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center and the University of California, Berkeley.
Before joining Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Ms. Acos labored as a law clerk for Earthjustice in Oakland, California. She also spent a yr as a scientific student focusing on coastal weather change and land use troubles at the kingdom and local level. She turned into a law clerk for Coronel & Perez Abogados in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Fluent in Spanish and Portuguese, Ms. Acos labored as a paralegal and translator for an international arbitration group at Arnold & Porter, LLP, previous to attending law school.
About the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County
The Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County (Legal Aid) is a non-income law firm that offers unfastened prison assistance to Santa Barbara County residents. Its task is to provide remarkable civil legal services to low-profits and different vulnerable citizens to ensure the same access to justice. Legal Aid adjustments live via direct representation, legal recommendation and records, and network education. Since 1959, Legal Aid has furnished criminal services to those maximum in want in our network. Its places of work are positioned in Santa Barbara, Lompoc, and Santa Maria.
Statistics display that legal malpractice claims have become more frequent for the remaining three many years. There are several times wherein a client loses confidence within his attorney’s talents because the latter made subjects worse in preference to presenting a resolution to the problem. If you suffered damages due to your lawyer’s wrongful behavior, may also or not it’s due to his negligence or intentional act, you can do not forget the option of bringing a legal malpractice motion. However, proving a criminal malpractice claim could be challenging because it often entails a substantial search for appropriate arguments and corroborating proof. Despite the life of actual damages, other factors want to be examined to decide whether a prison malpractice claim must be filed.
If the client can show that the lawyer’s negligence or wrongful act resulted in damages, such damages could be recovered with the aid of filing a legal malpractice lawsuit. However, there are instances where damages aren’t effortlessly ascertainable. In such cases, the California Supreme Court held that restoration of damages may want to be still presented. However, the lifestyles and the purpose of such damages are hard to decide. On the most element but, damages that might be based on speculation or mere hazard of future damage are normally not provided by California courts.
Clients are likely to be a greater hit with the recuperation of so-called “direct” damages. These are damages that have been the direct result of an attorney’s negligence or misconduct. For example, in a case in which an attorney wrongfully advises his consumer to record for financial ruin and promote his home for a decrease rate than its marketplace price, the court is likely to award the client damages to the quantity of what he misplaced from the sale. In some other case, a California court docket presented damages to a medical doctor due to the lack of accurate popularity and the growth in rates for his clinical malpractice insurance because of his legal professional’s negligence.